Tesla's 'Alien Dreadnought' factory takes a step forward with structural cable patent

Discussion in 'Model 3' started by simonalvarez0987, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:14 AM.

  1. simonalvarez0987

    simonalvarez0987 Active Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2017
    Messages:
    801
    #1 simonalvarez0987, Oct 12, 2018 at 12:14 AM
    Last edited by a moderator: Oct 12, 2018 at 7:19 AM
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    When Elon Musk envisioned the Model 3 production line, he saw a factory that was so automated; it looked like it was literally out of this world. In later statements, Musk shared Tesla’s internal name for the automated factory - Alien Dreadnought - a reference to the fascinating, intricate extraterrestrial motherships that are a trope of classic sci-fi franchises. Musk also noted that the Alien Dreadnought should be operational sometime in 2018. 

    The Model 3 production ramp would eventually teach Elon Musk that his timeline for the Alien Dreadnought was far too optimistic. Since starting the production of the electric car, Tesla has been met with bottleneck after bottleneck in both the Fremont factory and Gigafactory 1. While Tesla was eventually able to find a system that balances robot and human work to effectively ramp the Model 3, Musk would later admit that Tesla overreached when it came to the automation of its production lines. In a post on Twitter, Musk candidly noted that human workers are still underrated.



    While Elon Musk’s Alien Dreadnought factory might be coming later than expected, the company appears to be paving the way for even more automation in its factories. A recently published patent on Thursday, for one, outlines a structural cable design that is fully optimized for automated manufacturing. In the discussions of the patent, Tesla described the rationale of a structural cable that is rigid by design.

    “The structural cable according to the present disclosure is a cable with structural integrity that may be manipulated into place by a robotic arm as part of an automated process while providing reliable data connections to its desired location. As part of the form manipulation, the structural cable preferentially allows manipulation into different geometries allowing for placement that avoids obstacles, and that can be performed in a reproducible manner so as to be implemented as part of an automated process.”

    Tesla notes in its patent that traditional cables, due to their non-rigid nature, are best installed by human hands, which connect the appropriate connectors to their respective ports during the production process. The electric car maker notes that this is due to the cables lacking “sufficient structural integrity and rigidity to be easily picked up, moved, and placed by a robotic arm,” as well as their inability to be formed into pre-determined shapes.

    “Because traditional cables are not rigid, they may not be easily formed into different shapes and routed to a pre-determined location amidst tight spatial constraints. Routing traditional, flexible cables during manufacturing, for example to connect different components during automobile manufacturing, typically cannot be automated and therefore require humans to place by hand. Such manual placement is time-consuming, tedious, and costly. Hence, there is a need for a structural cable that overcomes the aforementioned drawbacks.”

    [​IMG][​IMG][​IMG]

    Tesla’s designs for its structural cable design as outlined in the newly-published patent. [Source: Patentscope]

    Tesla intends to work around these compromises by using a rigid structural cable, which could be easily picked up and installed automatically by a robotic arm. By using such components, Tesla would be able to optimize the level of automation in its facilities even further.

    “An advantage of this flat cable configuration with known geometries and wires/conductors spaced at known dimensions (and preferably collinear) is that the process of connecting the flat wires/conductors to connectors may be automated through, for example crimping, traditional soldering, or laser soldering. In a specific implementation, encased wires are held on a flat conveyer or with a robotic arm, and the wires are stripped using a stripping attachment so as to preserve the wire spacing. The robotic arm (or another robotic arm) may then pick up a connector and crimp the connector to the wires by pressing down (or utilizing an appropriate tool).”

    It should be noted that while Elon Musk’s Alien Dreadnought factory is delayed, the company’s production lines are already heavily automated. Back in the Q1 2018 earnings call, for one, Elon Musk noted that Tesla was able to reduce the time it takes to produce Model 3 battery packs by 94%, from seven hours per unit to under 17 minutes per pack. Tesla has since improved its production lines in the Fremont factory and Gigafactory 1, and this Q4 2018, the company intends to optimize its operations even further. Gigafactory 1, for example, is expected to receive new battery cell assembly lines from Panasonic this quarter. New Grohmann machines, which are expected to improve production, are also expected to go online in the Nevada facility this Q4 as well.

    The full text of Tesla’s patent for its structural cables could be accessed here.

    Article: Tesla's 'Alien Dreadnought' factory takes a step forward with structural cable patent
     
    • Like Like x 1
  2. Roy_H

    Roy_H Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Messages:
    135
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    I think this is a really big deal. Another major step in reducing cost of building automobiles. Tesla made the major innovation of reducing the complexity of distributed electronics (separate computers for almost every function) into one computer for the whole car, designing their own electric motors and controllers which other manufacturers are now realizing they have to copy to remain competitive. Most traditional auto manufacturers pointed out that battery cost would make electric cars too expensive, but never thought of reducing cost by reducing wiring and complexity. This innovation could have been applied to ICE cars, but the industry just doesn't have the fresh approach that Elon Musk has.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Null

    Null New Member

    Joined:
    May 26, 2017
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    The Triangle
    2 computers, 3 if you count redundant one for car management and autopilot.

    But yes extremely minimal wiring
    Coming from a person who rebuilt 2 of the 3 wiring harnesses for a '67 charger. had to recrimp 2 wires but after that it worked.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. J.Taylor

    J.Taylor Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2017
    Messages:
    421
    Location:
    Canada
    Always good to see innovations that work to make a Tesla car more affordable.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. Jimi Seko

    Jimi Seko New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2018
    Messages:
    3
    Location:
    St. Louis, Missouri
    In the old days large auto companies were run by engineers not MBAs. Tesla's biggest advantage is having an engineer/ rocket scientist for its CEO.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. Roy_H

    Roy_H Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Messages:
    135
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Are you referring to the inverter/battery management as one computer and the car/autopilot as the second? I didn't know the main computer was a pair for redundancy. Thanks for the info.
     

Share This Page