Tesla receives another Model S P85D lawsuit in Norway

Discussion in 'Model S' started by simonalvarez0987, Jan 11, 2018.

  1. simonalvarez0987

    simonalvarez0987 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2017
    Messages:
    24
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The Model S P85D has become quite a controversial vehicle in Norway, especially after more than a hundred Tesla owners managed to win a lawsuit against the California-based firm last year over alleged false advertising of the high-performance electric car. Now, a new batch of Tesla-owning plaintiffs has emerged in the country, and they are hoping to reach the same settlement as their predecessors.

    The new lawsuit outlines the same complaints as the 2017 case, with the 79 new plaintiffs claiming that Tesla misrepresented the Model S P85D when the company marketed its performance numbers. The Model S P85D, the first of Tesla’s cars to offer a dual-motor configuration, was promoted by the Elon Musk-led electric car firm as a vehicle with 691 hp. When Tesla enthusiasts ran the car on the dyno, however, many were disappointed to discover that the P85D only had 469 hp.

    The reason for the discrepancy was rather simple. Being a dual-motor vehicle, Tesla advertised the Model S P85D with the combined horsepower from both its front and rear motors. The front motor of the car produces 221 hp and the rear, as could be seen in dyno tests of the vehicle, produces 471 hp. Combined, the P85D’s dual motors do align with Tesla’s figures, producing a combined 691 hp. For some P85D owners in Norway, however, this was tantamount false advertising.

    Christoffer Falkeid, the lawyer representing the 79 new Model S P85D owners, stated that his clients are looking to get the same settlement as their predecessors from last year. When Norway’s courts ruled in favor of the plaintiffs last year, Tesla ended up paying 65,000 kroner (about $10,500) to each plaintiff to settle the case. Others opted to receive a combination of cash, upgrades to their vehicles and additional equipment packages.

    “It’s the same kind of case that ended up in a compromise the last time. It’s about the power of the car and the mistakes in marketing and in the sales process, but I do not want to go into amounts,” the lawyer said, according to a Dagens Naerlingsliv report.

    Despite its legal troubles with some disgruntled Model S P85D owners, Tesla remains thoroughly committed to its ever-growing customer base in Norway. The European nation, after all, is one of the most progressive countries in the region when it comes to clean and sustainable transportation. Tesla CEO Elon Musk, for one, has personally praised Norway for its pledge to ban the sale of ICE vehicles by 2025. The Model S has also held the title of best-selling vehicle in the country, besting other EVs and ICE cars alike.

    As we recently reported, several high-profile Norwegian firms such as ASKO and Posten Norge have fully embraced the Musk’s vision of the future, with both companies filing orders for the Tesla Semi, which is expected to be rolled out in 2019.

    Article: Tesla receives another Model S P85D lawsuit in Norway
     
  2. sarita.shipe1958

    sarita.shipe1958 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Wow, I hope they loose this one. The D series hp ratings are obviously the total of the two motors. I don\'t know how they can argue that it only refers to part of the car!
    So what was the last lawsuit? Auto manufacturers here anyway advertise hp at the motor, not at the wheels and there are transmission etc. losses which are not defined. Do Norway car owners take motors out, have them tested, then sue other car companies if it falls short?
     
  3. Scott Purdy

    Scott Purdy New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2017
    Messages:
    2
    I really like how Elon Musk cares about the future so much he\'ll dump all his personal money into a brighter future and anyone SELFISH enough to fight against a brighter future like say these frivolous lawsuits and tRump our shit for potus should STFU and move aside because the future is coming regardless of the dumbasses of the world. Why are their always assh*ls that feel that need to stand in the way or try to stop a positive thing from happening??
     
  4. Bill C

    Bill C New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    2
    Location:
    Southern California
    Hey, Scott? Do your parents know you're playing on their computer?

    As long as you're on the internet you might want to check out some grammar sites. They'll teach you things, like, how to use commas and recognizing when you've created run-on sentences. Of course, that'll only help you present your opinions in a more polished way. They won't really help with your childish anger towards those who disagree with your worldview. Oh, and the president's name is spelled Trump, not tRump. Enjoy camp.
     
  5. paulabreedlove4

    paulabreedlove4 New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    I couldn\'t get any 2 numbers to match any totals. The horsepower of the front motor in the article is 221 and the rear motor is 471 ? That adds up to 442, no? Well, the Norwegians sueing got 469? How did they do that? Tesla\'s (conservative) figure was 691 not 692 as the figures in the article would indicate (OK, I can attribute that to \'rounding\'). Is this another author being paid by the word? Explain what I\'m missing. Please.
     
  6. Arnebarne

    Arnebarne New Member

    Joined:
    Saturday
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    0960 Norge
    The specified 691 hp output is not available because the battery is not able to feed the motors adequately.
     
  7. Jayyy

    Jayyy New Member

    Joined:
    Wednesday
    Messages:
    1
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Great insight on the article. I applaud your critical thinking skills.
     

Share This Page