Advancement in nuclear fusion tech continues transition to clean energy future

Discussion in 'In the News' started by AstroJane, Dec 4, 2018.

  1. AstroJane

    AstroJane Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Messages:
    65
    Location:
    North Wales, PA
    Home Page:
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The development of unlimited, carbon-neutral, and safe energy through nuclear fusion is expanding around the world, and scientists at the Atomic Energy Authority in the United Kingdom (AEA) have recently cleared one more key hurdle to making it a commercial reality: exhausting gas that’s hotter than the Sun. The hot plasma created during fusion power generation needs to cool down as it’s being used, but at its extreme temperatures, there aren’t any materials available to withstand the heat. Now, that problem appears to have been solved.

    The AEA team’s answer to the heat issue is a “sacrificial wall” design which will require replacement every few years. Plasma will be moved down a path within its fusion generator’s holding device to cool it slightly before coming into contact with a specially designed wall for the remainder of the cooling process. However, even at a lower temperature, the heat will degrade the wall’s integrity over time and need to be changed. With the first nuclear fusion reactor set to turn on in seven years, AEA’s fusion exhaust system may be one of the developments that keeps it on schedule.

    It’s said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, and recent fusion energy developments show that sentiment’s considerations don’t remain within the bounds of Earth. At about 90 million miles away, our Sun is essentially a fusion reactor in the sky, its large size creating enough gravity to force atoms together at its core and release massive amounts of energy. Artificially reproducing the conditions needed for this kind of generation is tough, but the attempt has been going on since the 1960s. The AEA is representative of one agency in a global endeavor.

    The most advanced nuclear fusion project today is ITER, the International Nuclear Fusion Research experimental reactor in southern France, which hosts scientists from 35 countries dedicated to achieving the first ever positive fusion energy production. Their device is called a “tokamak”, and its structure is something like a flattened donut (torus) encapsulated by rings of powerful magnetic coils. The magnetic fields generated by the coils both suspend the plasma created by extreme heat and squeeze the plasma into a small space to create the fusion reactions. ITER is scheduled to turn its reactor on in 2025.

    [​IMG]A visualization of the ITER tokamak in operation.| Credit: ITER.org/Jamison Daniel, Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility[​IMG]A computer-animated visualization of the ITER tokamak in operation. | Credit: ITER.org

    Creating fusion in a laboratory involves two primary parts: 1) creating plasma, a soup of electrons and nuclei released from their atomic structures due to extremely high temperatures; and 2) merging the nuclei of two different types of atoms, generally different forms of hydrogen. The heat in a tokamak is generated from both the magnetic field movement and external heating devices, and the nuclei merge is achieved by squeezing the plasma using those same magnetic fields into a constricted area to encourage collisions. Essentially, the high heat excites the atomic particles, speeding their motion, and their energetic movements within the magnetically confined area significantly increases the likelihood the nuclei will crash and fuse together. When this fusion occurs, a massive amount of energy is released, the object of desire for all involved in this field of research.

    The amount of heat needed to convince atoms to release their electrons and form plasma is in the range of millions of degrees Celsius, the core of the Sun itself being 15 million degrees. Without high gravity to aid with squeezing plasma, as in the Sun’s case at 27 times the gravity of Earth, reactors on our planet need to heat well beyond the Sun’s temperature to ensure the atomic particles in the plasma collide and fuse. ITER’s tokamak heats to 100 million degrees Celsius.

    [​IMG]A visual representation of the completed tokamak at ITER. | Credit: ITER.org

    All of this heating and magnetic control requires its own energy input, and this is where the current state of fusion energy development is focused. The ratio of energy used and energy produced is called “Q”, the desired amount aimed for by scientists in the field being 10:1. When ten times the energy is produced by nuclear fusion than used to produce it, it will have advanced to a level ready for further development as an alternative power source, or so goes the thinking. ITER’s specific goal is to produce 500 MW of fusion power from 50 MW of heating power.

    Once energy is released from the fusion process, it can then be captured to create steam to power generators currently using other power sources such as coal and natural gas. This is another benefit purported benefit of fusion power; it can plug directly into existing power grids, minimizing any disruptions or requirements for new equipment. Combined with the abundant availability of hydrogen and the lack of greenhouses gases or radioactive waste, there are high hopes for fusion’s future as an all-in-one energy solution.

    Article: Advancement in nuclear fusion tech continues transition to clean energy future
     
  2. J.Taylor

    J.Taylor Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2017
    Messages:
    459
    Location:
    Canada
    Fusion has always been a dream technology but never yet a real source of energy (other than the sun). We are not there yet and should not count our chickens before we even have eggs.
    The containment device that is designed to wear should not also remove the heat from the system, instead they should force air into the outside edge of the stream diluting the original hot gas while heating the protective layer.
    This will result in a larger quantity of usable heat.
    Meanwhile, the bulk of funding should be spent on installing wind, solar and geothermal, which we have already developed. We need to have a system in place to replace fossil fuels, not just spend decades trying to develop a new technology that may have hidden issues that make it far more difficult than we are told.
     
  3. cygnusexwon

    cygnusexwon New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2018
    Messages:
    28
    Location:
    New York
    I don’t see fusion as a viable and cost effective means of producing energy on earth. Solar and wind have made major advancements over the years producing clean energy. The really big players, which we’ve have only begone to scratch the surface of, are Geo-Thermal and Tidal.
    The earth’s crust is a very thin layer, only 3-4 miles under the oceans and 20 - 30 miles for the continental crust. Our mantle is an absolutely eminence source of energy that is accessible just by going down.
    The Oceans are nothing to sneeze at either. They also contain a tremendous amount of energy free for the taking.

    Fusion is much better suited for energy production off world where wind, geo-thermal and tidal aren’t available. The ITER uses the hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium as its fuel source. A less destructive fuel is helium-3 which is an isotope of helium. 3He is difficult to get ahold of on earth but readily available off world. The moons regolith is loaded with it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. myfree

    myfree Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2018
    Messages:
    33
    You are aware that a fusion reactor does generate radioactive waste?
     
  5. Roy_H

    Roy_H Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Messages:
    177
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Uh, no, I've never read anything about the products produced by fusion and I did not realize it was radio-active. can you elaborate compared with uranium fission producing almost same mass of waste as starting and 10,000 year decay time and LFTR producing about 100 grams of waste per ton of fuel that just takes 300 years to decay. Of course I think that Liquid Flouride Thorium Reactors are the best path forward.
     

Share This Page